Warren Buffett famously said, ‘Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.’ It’s only natural to consider a company’s balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
When Is Debt A Problem?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can’t easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of ‘creative destruction’ where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company’s debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
What Is MGE Energy’s Net Debt?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of December 2022 MGE Energy had US$710.1m of debt, an increase on US$624.6m, over one year. And it doesn’t have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.
How Healthy Is MGE Energy’s Balance Sheet?
The latest balance sheet data shows that MGE Energy had liabilities of US$225.1m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.21b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$11.6m in cash and US$109.9m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.31b.
This deficit isn’t so bad because MGE Energy is worth US$2.86b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
MGE Energy has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 5.9 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn’t want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. If MGE Energy can keep growing EBIT at last year’s rate of 17% over the last year, then it will find its debt load easier to manage. There’s no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if MGE Energy can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, MGE Energy recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is far more risky for companies with unreliable free cash flow, so shareholders should be hoping that the past expenditure will produce free cash flow in the future.
Our View
MGE Energy’s conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered cast it in a significantly better light. For example, its EBIT growth rate is relatively strong. It’s also worth noting that MGE Energy is in the Electric Utilities industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that MGE Energy is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind.