The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway’s Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says ‘The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.’ So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ:TER) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
When Is Debt A Problem?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
How Much Debt Does Teradyne Carry?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Teradyne had debt of US$357.4m at the end of July 2021, a reduction from US$402.3m over a year. However, it does have US$1.24b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of US$879.2m.
How Strong Is Teradyne’s Balance Sheet?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Teradyne had liabilities of US$985.4m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$522.3m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$1.24b as well as receivables valued at US$868.5m due within 12 months. So it actually has US$597.4m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
This surplus suggests that Teradyne has a conservative balance sheet, and could probably eliminate its debt without much difficulty. Succinctly put, Teradyne boasts net cash, so it’s fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!
In addition to that, we’re happy to report that Teradyne has boosted its EBIT by 39%, thus reducing the spectre of future debt repayments. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Teradyne’s ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward.
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. Teradyne may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the most recent three years, Teradyne recorded free cash flow worth 72% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
Summing up
While it is always sensible to investigate a company’s debt, in this case Teradyne has US$879.2m in net cash and a decent-looking balance sheet. And we liked the look of last year’s 39% year-on-year EBIT growth. So we don’t think Teradyne’s use of debt is risky.